Institutions of Higher Education (HEIs) faced great challenges, due to the COVID- crisis, on swiftly dealing with this unprecedented situation regarding the implementation of practical courses and interactive educational activities such as project-based courses. The aim of this work is to analyze the challenges and difficulties that arose through this process and the benefits that have emerged for both students and educators. For this reason, questionnaires were designed to study the pedagogical practices used for a project-based course, during the pandemic, and were distributed online to all students and supervisors enrolled in the course. The course entailed the design of an innovative food product, from the interactive analysis of different novel ideas to the production of a final product of high nutritional and ecological profile. Despite the concern that the enforcement of distance learning would significantly affect project-based courses, the majority of respondents confirmed that their institution adapted the curriculum successfully. They also declared satisfaction with the general format, and teaching procedures adopted, and agreed that the online modality can properly transmit educational content. Although, both faculty and students needed to adapt to the distance learning modality and become familiar with the use of new digital tools, they agreed that it can be very useful and provide benefits, when properly planned in advance and accompanied by the right technical support, equipment and class materials.
Abumalloh R, Asadi S, Nilashi M, Minaei-Bidgoli B, Nayer F, Samad S, et al. The impact of coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) on education: The role of virtual and remote laboratories in education. Technology in Society. 2021. p. 67–101728.
2.
Adedoyin O, Soykan E. Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments. 2020. p. 1–13.
3.
Alexander B, Becker S, Cummins M, Giesinger C. The New Media Consortium. 2017.
4.
Alhawsawi H. Teacher educators’ approaches to teaching foundation of Islamic education at a university in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 2017.
5.
Alhawsawi S, Jawhar S. Negotiating pedagogical positions in higher education during COVID-19 pandemic: Teacher’s narratives. Heliyon. 2021. p. 7158.
6.
Amhag L, Hellström L, Stigmar M. Teacher educators’ use of digital tools and needs for digital competence in higher education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. 2019. p. 203–20.
7.
Brinkley-Etzkorn K. Learning to teach online: Measuring the influence of faculty development training on teaching effectiveness through a TPACK lens. The Internet and Higher Education. 2018. p. 28–35.
8.
Burke R, Danaher P. Assessment and evaluation of student learning through a project-based assignment on note by note cooking [Number: 2]. International. Journal of Food Studies. 2020. p. 282–94.
9.
Flynn K, Ho P, Vieira M, Pittia P, Rosa M. Food science and technology students self-evaluate soft and technical skills [Number: 2]. International. Journal of Food Studies. 2017. p. 1.
10.
Fonseca S, Pinheiro R, Barbosa C, Araújo A, Vaz-Velho M, Alves R. Food innovation and entrepreneurship in higher education: A case study [Number: 2]. International Journal of Food Studies. 2015. p. 3.
11.
Ghomi M, Redecker C. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Com. CSEDU; 2019. p. 541–8.
12.
Giannou V, Lakner Z, Pittia P, Mayor L, Costa R, Silva C, et al. Emergency remote teaching for a project-based assignment 27 professionals at the entrance in the job market. International Journal of Food Studies. 2015. p. 173–87.
13.
Gutierrez-Bucheli L, Kidman G, Reid A. Sustainability in engineering education: A review of learning outcomes. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022. p. 129734.
14.
Iglesias-Pradas S, Hernández-García Á, Chaparro-Peláez J, Prieto J. Emergency remote teaching and students’ academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior. 2021. p. 119–106713.
15.
Khan M, Abdou B. Article 100187. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2021.
16.
Koulouris A, Aroutidis G, Vardalis D, Giannoulis P, Karakosta P. Enhancing food engineering education with interactive web-based simulations. International Journal of Food Studies. 2015. p. 1.
17.
Martin F, Ritzhaupt A, Kumar S, Budhrani K. Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. The Internet and Higher Education. 2019. p. 34–43.
18.
Núñez-Canal M, De Obesso M, Pérez-Rivero C. New challenges in higher education: A study of the digital competence of educators in COVID times. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022.
19.
Rahman N, Hussein N, Aluwi A. Satisfaction on blended learning in a public higher education institution: What factors matter? Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. p. 768–75.
20.
Rapanta C, Botturi L, Goodyear P, Guàrdia L, Koole M. Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education. 2020. p. 923–45.
21.
Rasheed R, Kamsin A, Abdullah N. Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education. 2020. p. 144–103701.
22.
Reisoglu İ, A. How can the digital competences of pre-service teachers be developed? Examining a case study through the lens of DigComp and DigCompEdu. Computers & Education. 2020. p. 156–103940.
23.
Schreck C, Weilbach J, Reitsma G. Improving graduate attributes by implementing an experiential learning teaching approach: A case study in recreation education. Journal of Hospitality. 2020. p. 26–100214.
24.
WHO director-general’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 -11. World Health Organization; 2020.
25.
Zalat M, Hamed M, Bolbol S. The experiences, challenges, and acceptance of e-learning as a tool for teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic among university medical staff. PLoS ONE. 2021.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
