Food oral processing in humans: links between physiological parameters, release of flavour stimuli and flavour perception of food

Gilles Feron ,
Gilles Feron
Contact Gilles Feron

Centre des Sciences du Gout et de l`Alimentation, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comt, France

Christian Salles
Christian Salles

Centre des Sciences du Gout et de l’Alimentation, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comte, France

Published: 18.04.2018.

Volume 7, Issue 1 (2018)

pp. 1-12;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/7.1.2018.a1

Abstract

In humans, food oral processing (FOP) is the first step in the digestive process. It prepares the food for swallowing and to undergo the process of digestion. During chewing, the food is comminuted by the combined action of chewing and saliva to form a bolus. The particle size of the bolus is reduced due to the action of the tongue and the teeth, and the saliva is continuously produced by the salivary glands to humidify and impregnate the food. Saliva lubricates the bolus and enables the cohesion of particles to prepare for swallowing. During food oral processing, the compounds responsible for food flavour and taste are released, leading to the perception of food organoleptic properties and significantly contributing to the consumer’s acceptability of the product. Understanding this process of food breakdown and bolus formation thus appears to be a way to revisit food functional properties. However, this process is extremely complex, and as such, its description necessitates a combination of many quantities from different disciplines, i.e., physics, chemistry, physiology, psychology, behavioural science and food science. It depends, on one hand, on food properties and on the other hand, it depends on oral physiology. However, large inter-individual variability is commonly observed, which has important consequences on flavour release and perception. The challenge for the food industry is to be able to develop food considering this large variability, and sensory and nutritional constraints. This challenge is particularly relevant when specific populations (i.e., elderly, infants or obese subjects) are considered.

Keywords

References

1.
Bakker J, Brown W, Hills B, Boudaud N, Wilson C, Harrison M. Effect of the food matrix on flavour release and perception. The Royal Society of Chemistry; 1996. p. 369–74.
2.
Bartoshuk L. The psychophysics of taste. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1978. p. 1068–77.
3.
Blissett A, Hort J, Taylor A. Influence of chewing and swallowing behavior on volatile release in two confectionery systems. Journal of Texture Studies. 2006. p. 1–12.
4.
Boland A, Delahunty C, Van Ruth S. Influence of the texture of gelatin gels and pectin gels on strawberry flavour release and perception. Food Chemistry. 2006. p. 452–60.
5.
Buettner A. Influence of human saliva on odorant concentrations. 2. aldehydes, alcohols. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002. p. 7105–10.
6.
Buettner A. Influence of human salivary enzymes on odorant concentration changes occurring in vivo. 1. esters and thiols. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002. p. 3283–9.
7.
Buettner A, Beer A, Hannig C, Settles M, Schieberle P. Physiological and analytical studies on flavor perception dynamics as induced by the eating and swallowing process. Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium. 2002. p. 497–504.
8.
Chen J, Lolivret L. The determining role of bolus rheology in triggering a swallowing. Food Hydrocolloids. 2011. p. 325–32.
9.
Davidson J, Linforth R, Taylor A. In-mouth measurement of ph and conductivity during eating. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1998. p. 5210–4.
10.
Davidson J, Linforth R, Hollowood T, Taylor A. Flavor release (Chap. 9. 2000. p. 99–111.
11.
De Lavergne M, Derks J, Ketel E, De Wijk R, Stieger M. Eating behaviour explains differences between individuals in dynamic texture perception of sausages. Food Quality and Preference. 2015. p. 189–200.
12.
De Wijk R, Prinz J. The role of friction in perceived oral texture. Food Quality and Preference. 2005. p. 121–9.
13.
Dessirier J, Simons C, Carstens M, O’mahony M, Carstens E. Psychophysical and neurobiological evidence that the oral sensation elicited by carbonated water is of chemogenic origin. Chemical Senses. 2000. p. 277–84.
14.
Emorine M, Mielle P, Maratray J, Septier C, Thomas-Danguin T, Salles C. Use of sensors to measure in-mouth salt release during food chewing. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2012. p. 3124–30.
15.
Feron G, Guichard E. Mécanismes en bouche et variabilité inter individuelle: liens entre paramétres physiologiques, libération des stimuli sensoriels et perception de l’aliment. Innovations Agronomiques. 2014. p. 15–26.
16.
Feron G, Salles C, Guichard E. 6 international conference on proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry and its applications. Innsbruck University Press; 2013. p. 46–50.
17.
Feron G, Ayed C, Qannari E, Courcoux P, Laboure H, Guichard E. Understanding aroma release from model cheeses by a statistical multiblock approach on oral processing. Plos One. 2014.
18.
Ferry A, Hort J, Mitchell J, Lagarrigue S, Pamies B. Effect of amylase activity on starch paste viscosity and its implications for flavor perception. Journal of Texture Studies. 2004. p. 511–24.
19.
Ferry AL, Mitchell J, Hort J, Hill S, Taylor A, Lagarrigue S, et al. In-mouth amylase activity can reduce perception of salti-ness in starch-thickened foods. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2006. p. 8869–73.
20.
Godlewski A, Veyrune J, Nicolas E, Ciangura C, Chaussain C, Czernichow S, et al. Effect of dental status on changes in mastication in patients with obesity following bariatric surgery. Plos One. 2011.
21.
Guichard E, Sémon E, Gierczynski I, Tournier C, Saint-Eve A, Souchon I, et al. 12th weurman symposium. ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften; 2008. p. 117–20.
22.
Guinard J, Zoumasmorse C, Walchak C. Relation between parotid saliva flow and composition and the perception of gustatory and trigeminal stimuli in foods. Physiology & Behavior. 1997. p. 109–18.
23.
Guinard J, Zoumasmorse C, Walchak C, Simpson H. Relation between saliva flow and flavor release from chewing gum. Physiology & Behavior. 1997. p. 591–6.
24.
Hershkovich O, Nagler R. Biochemical analysis of saliva and taste acuity evaluation in patients with burning mouth syndrome, xerostomia and/or gustatory disturbances. Archives of Oral Biology. 2004. p. 515–22.
25.
Hutchings J, Lillford P. The perception of food texture -the philosophy of the breakdown path. Journal of Texture Studies. 1988. p. 103–15.
26.
Kohyama K, Mioche L. Chewing behavior observed at different stages of mastication for six foods, studied by electromyography and jaw kinematics in young and elderly subjects. Journal of Texture Stud-ies. 2004. p. 395–414.
27.
Labbe D, Schlich P, Pineau N, Gilbert F, Martin N. Temporal dominance of sensations and sensory profiling: a comparative study. Food Quality and Preference. 2009. p. 216–21.
28.
Le Quéré JL, Gierczynski I, Langlois D, Sémon E. Nosespace with an ion trap mass spectrometer-quantitative aspects. Developments in Food Science. 2006. p. 589–92.
29.
Le Quéré JL, Guichard E. 5. international conference on proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry and its applications. Innsbruck university press; 2011.
30.
Lenfant F, Loret C, Pineau N, Hartmann C, Martin N. Perception of oral food breakdown. the concept of sensory trajectory. Appetite. 2009. p. 659–67.
31.
Mestres M, Moran N, Jordan A, Buettner A. Aroma release and retronasal perception during and after consumption of flavored whey protein gels with different textures. 1. in vivo release analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2005. p. 403–9.
32.
Mioche L, Bourdiol P, Monier S, Martin J, Cormier D. Changes in jaw muscles activity with age: effects on food bolus properties. Physiology & Behavior. 2004. p. 621–7.
33.
Mishellany A, Woda A, Labas R, Peyron M, -A. ; Y Mishellany-Dutour A, Woda A, et al. Retro-nasal aroma release is correlated with variations in the inmouth air cavity volume after empty deglutition. Dysphagia. 2006. p. 7.
34.
Ijfs A. Food oral processing in humans 11. 2018. p. 1–12.
35.
Modeer T, Blomberg C, Wondimu B, Julihn A, Marcus C. Association between obesity, flow rate of whole saliva, and dental caries in adolescents. Obesity. 2010. p. 2367–73.
36.
Morzel M, Jeannin A, Lucchi G, Truntzer C, Pecqueur D, Nicklaus S, et al. Human infant saliva peptidome is modified with age and diet transition. Journal of Proteomics. 2012. p. 3665–73.
37.
Nagler R, Hershkovich O. Relationships between age, drugs, oral sensorial complaints and salivary profile. Archives of Oral Biology. 2005. p. 7–16.
38.
Nicklaus S, Demonteil L, Tournier C. ing food texture. Elsevier Ltd; 2015.
39.
Pagès-Hélary S, Andriot I, Guichard E, Canon F. Retention effect of human saliva on aroma release and respective contribution of salivary mucin and αamylase. Food Research International. 2014. p. 424–31.
40.
Phan V, Yven C, Lawrence G, Chabanet C, Reparet J, Salles C. In vivo sodium release related to salty perception during eating model cheeses of different textures. International Dairy Journal. 2008. p. 956–63.
41.
Piombino P, Genovese A, Esposito S, Moio L, Cutolo P, Chambery A. Saliva from obese individuals suppresses the release of aroma compounds from wine. Plos One. 2014.
42.
Pionnier E, Chabanet C, Mioche L, Taylor A, Le Quere J, Salles C. 2. in vivo nonvolatile release during eating of a model cheese: relationships with oral parameters. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2004. p. 565–71.
43.
Ployon S, Morzel M, Canon F. The role of saliva in aroma release and perception. Food Chemistry. 2017. p. 212–20.
44.
Poette J, Lubbers S, Maison B, Andrito I, Pernin K, Guichard E, et al. Advances and challenges in flavor chemistry and biology. proceedings of the 9th wartburg symposium. 2010. p. 386–9.
45.
Prinz J, Lucas P. Swallow thresholds in human mastication. Archives of Oral Biology. 1995. p. 401–3.
46.
Prinz J, Lucas P. Saliva tannin interactions. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2000. p. 991–4.
47.
Quintana M, Palicki O, Lucchi G, Ducoroy P, Chambon C, Salles C, et al. Inter-individual variability of protein patterns in saliva of healthy adults. Journal of Proteomics. 2009. p. 822–30.
48.
Rolls E, Rolls J. Olfactory sensory-specific satiety in humans. Physiology & Behavior. 1997. p. 461–73.
49.
Ruijschop R, Burgering M, Jacobs M, Boelrijk A. Retro-nasal aroma release depends on both subject and product differences: a link to food intake regulation? Chemical Senses. 2009. p. 395–403.
50.
Salles C, Chagnon MC, Feron G, Guichard E, Laboure H, Morzel M, et al. -mouth mechanisms leading to flavor release and perception. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2011. p. 67–90.
51.
Schipper R, Silletti E, Vingerhoeds M. Saliva as research material: biochemical, physicochemical and practical aspects. Archives of Oral Biology. 2007. p. 1114–35.
52.
Tournier C, Rodrigues J, Canon F, Salles C, Feron G. A method to evaluate chewing efficiency in infants through food bolus characterization: a preliminary study. Journal of Texture Studies. 2015. p. 113–9.
53.
Van Der Bilt A, Fontijn-Tekamp F. Comparison of single and multiple sieve methods for the determination of masticatory performance. Archives of Oral Biology. 2004. p. 193–8.
54.
Van Ruth S, Roozen J. Meeting on Interaction of Food Matrix with Small Ligands Influencing Flavor and Texture. Food Chemistry. UNIV DEGLI STUDI UDINE; 2000. p. 339–45.
55.
Vandenberghe-Descamps M, Laboure H, Prot A, Septier C, Tournier C, Feron G, et al. 353-360. 1st Food for Elderly International Conference. Journal of Texture Studies. 2016.
56.
Vors C, Drai J, Gabert L, Pineau G, Laville M, Vidal H, et al. Salivary composition in obese vs normalweight subjects: towards a role in postprandial lipid metabolism? International Journal of Obesity. 2015. p. 1425–8.
57.
Yven C, Guessasma S, Chaunier L, Della Valle G, Salles C. The role of mechanical properties of brittle airy foods on the masticatory performance. Journal of Food Engineering. 2010. p. 85–91.
58.
Yven C, Culioli J, Mioche L. Meat bolus properties in relation with meat texture and chewing context. Meat Science. 2005. p. 365–71.
59.
Yven C, Patarin J, Magnin A, Laboure H, Repoux M, Guichard E, et al. Consequences of individual chewing strategies on bolus rheological properties at the swallowing threshold. Journal of Texture Studies. 2012. p. 1–12.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by