Issue image

More articles from Volume 5, Issue 1, 2016

Pronase hydrolysis as a pretreatment for quantifying Maillard intermediates during toasting of cornflakes

Towards the development of a common starter culture for fufu and usi (edible starch): Screening for potential starters

The emulsifying effect of biosurfactants produced by food spoilage organisms in Nigeria

A food recall case study in Australia – Towards the development of food safety applications for consumers

The Atlantic diet – Origin and features

Citations

Crossref Logo

10

Crossref Logo

Nidhi Gupta, Lynn Frewer, Arnout Fischer

(2017)

Nanotechnologies in Food

, ()

10.1039/9781782626879-00039

Crossref Logo

Helen Kendall, Beth Clark, Wenjing Li, Shan Jin, Glyn. D. Jones, Jing Chen, James Taylor, Zhenhong Li, Lynn. J. Frewer

(2022)

Precision agriculture technology adoption: a qualitative study of small-scale commercial “family farms” located in the North China Plain

Precision Agriculture, 23(1)

10.1007/s11119-021-09839-2

Crossref Logo

Gülbanu Kaptan, Arnout R.H. Fischer, Lynn J. Frewer

(2018)

Extrapolating understanding of food risk perceptions to emerging food safety cases

Journal of Risk Research, 21(8)

10.1080/13669877.2017.1281330

Crossref Logo

María Lavilla

(2019)

Reference Module in Food Science

, ()

10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22629-2

Crossref Logo

Jarissa Maselyne, Eva Maes, Tim Van De Gucht, Chari Vandenbussche, Ingrid Zwertvaegher, Stephanie Van Weyenberg

(2024)

Influence of automated animal health monitoring and animal welfare label on consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for filet mignon

Frontiers in Animal Science, 5()

10.3389/fanim.2024.1359650

Crossref Logo

Chad M. Baum, Joscelyn Eve Ladendorf, Stefanie Bröring, Hans De Steur

(2023)

Cisgenic Crops: Safety, Legal and Social Issues

Concepts and Strategies in Plant Sciences, ()

10.1007/978-3-031-10721-4_5

Crossref Logo

María Lavilla, Elisa Gayán

(2018)

Innovative Technologies for Food Preservation

, ()

10.1016/B978-0-12-811031-7.00007-8

Crossref Logo

Gülbanu Kaptan

(2018)

Reference Module in Food Science

, ()

10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.21416-9

Crossref Logo

Lynn J. FREWERRachel GAULTON, Zhenhong LI, Liping CHEN, Guijun YANG, Jing CHEN, Chunjiang ZHAO, Wenjing LI, Yiying CAO, James TAYLOR, Helen KENDALL, Glyn D. JONES, Beth CLARK,

(2018)

A proposed framework for accelerating technology trajectories in agriculture: a case study in China

Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 0(0)

10.15302/J-FASE-2018244

Crossref Logo

Shan Jin, Beth Clark, Sharron Kuznesof, Xuan Lin, Lynn J. Frewer

(2019)

Synthetic biology applied in the agrifood sector: Public perceptions, attitudes and implications for future studies

Trends in Food Science & Technology, 91()

10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.025

Barriers to using consumer science information in food technology innovations: An exploratory study using Delphi methodology

Marian E. Raley ,
Marian E. Raley

Food and Society Group, School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne , United Kingdom

Maddalena Ragona ,
Maddalena Ragona

Dipartimento di Scienze Statistiche, Universita di Bologna Italy

Siet J. Sijtsema ,
Siet J. Sijtsema

LEI Wageningen UR , Wageningen , Netherlands

Arnout R.H. Fischer ,
Arnout R.H. Fischer

Wageningen UR Marketing and Consumer Behaviour , Wageningen , Netherlands

Lynn J. Frewer
Lynn J. Frewer
Contact Lynn J. Frewer

Food and Society Group, School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne , United Kingdom

Published: 18.04.2016.

Volume 5, Issue 1 (2016)

pp. 39-53;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/5.1.2016.a4

Abstract

Food technology innovation has the potential to deliver many benefits to society, although some technologies have been problematic in terms of public acceptance. In promoting the commercial success of innovative technological processes and resultant products it will be important to incorporate information relating to consumer preferences and concerns during their development. The barriers to the utilisation of consumer information during technological development was explored using a two round Delphi study involving 75 experts with an interest in new food technology (food technologists and consumer scientists). There was overall agreement that consumer information should be used in technology implementation and product design, and that good communication between key actors at pivotal stages during the development of new food technologies and products was important. However disciplinary differences were perceived to be a barrier to communication, as were difficulties associated with producing consumer information usable by food technologists. A strategy to improve inter-disciplinary communication is proposed, involving the creation of multi-disciplinary teams working together throughout the development project’s duration, including those with interdisciplinary experience. Deficiencies in the specification of the information required from consumer scientists need to be overcome. Consumer science results need to be concrete and presented as salient to and usable by food technologists.

Keywords

References

1.
Stewart-Knox B, Mitchell P. What separates the winners from the losers in new food product development? Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2003;(1):58–64.
2.
Macnaghten P. In pursuit of nanoethics. 2014;167–81.
3.
Macoubrie J. Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2004;(4):395–405.
4.
Mussatto S, Mancilha I. Nondigestible oligosaccharides: a review. Carbohydrate polymers. 2007;(3):587–97.
5.
Rendueles E, Omer M, Alvseike O, Alonso-Calleja C, Capita R, Prieto M. Microbiological food safety assessment of high hydrostatic pressure processing: a review. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2011;(5):1251–60.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by