Extraction and characterisation of cellulose nanocrystals from pineapple peel

Ana Raquel Madureira ,
Ana Raquel Madureira
Contact Ana Raquel Madureira

Centro de Biotecnologia e Quımica Fina, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Cat´olica Portuguesa, Rua Dr. Antonio Bernardino de Almeida, Portugal

Tugba Atatoprak ,
Tugba Atatoprak

Centro de Biotecnologia e Quımica Fina, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Cat´olica Portuguesa, Rua Dr. Antonio Bernardino de Almeida, Portugal

Duygu Cabuk ,
Duygu Cabuk

Centro de Biotecnologia e Quımica Fina, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Cat´olica Portuguesa, Rua Dr. Antonio Bernardino de Almeida, Portugal

Flavia Sousa ,
Flavia Sousa

CICS - Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences-North, CESPU, Rua Central de Gandra, Gandra, Portugal

Manuela Pintado ,
Manuela Pintado

Centro de Biotecnologia e Quımica Fina, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Cat´olica Portuguesa, Rua Dr. Antonio Bernardino de Almeida, Portugal

Robert C. Pullar
Robert C. Pullar

Dept. Engenharia de Materiais e Ceramica / CICECO - Aveiro Institute of Materials, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitario de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal

Published: 18.04.2018.

Volume 7, Issue 1 (2018)

pp. 24-33;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/7.1.2018.a3

Abstract

The potential of pineapple peel as a source of cellulose nanocrystals was evaluated. Peels skin from fresh-cut fruit was used as raw material. These residues were purified to remove pigments, lipids and hemicellulose, and a bleaching process for delignification was carried out for 4-6 h. All resulting products were characterised for their lignin, hemicellulose, cellulose and ash contents using standard techniques. Dry matter at the end was low (ca. 50%) compared with the raw material (ca. 90%). The process applied resulted in ca. 20% (m/m) of purified cellulose (ca. 80% purity), with ineligible levels of lignin and hemicellulose present, especially when using 6h of bleaching. The purified cellulose was subject to acid hydrolysis for nanocrystal extraction with two testing times, 30 and 60 minutes. These cellulose nanocrystals had small sizes (< 1000 nm), with high variability and negative zeta potential values. The time of extraction did not affect the nanocrystals’ chemical and physical properties. The use of 6 h of bleaching treatment during purification was shown to be more effective than 4 h. Pineapple peel was demonstrated to be a good source of cellulose for the production of cellulose nanocrystals. 

Keywords

References

1.
Alemdar A, Sain M. Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues -wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresource Technology. 2008. p. 1664–71.
2.
Aspler J, Bouchard J, Hamad W, Berry R, Beck S, Drolet F, et al. Biopolymer nanocomposites. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2013. p. 461–508.
3.
Browning B. Methods of wood chemistry. volumes i & ii. John Wiley & Sons; 1967.
4.
Cherian B, Leao A, De Souza S, Thomas S, Pothan L, Kottaisamy M. Isolation of nanocellulose from pineapple leaf fibres by steam explosion. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2010. p. 720–5.
5.
Deepa B, Abraham E, Cherian B, Bismarck A, Blaker J, Pothan L, et al. Structure, morphology and thermal characteristics of banana nano fibers obtained by steam explosion. Bioresource Technology. 2011. p. 1988–97.
6.
Neto F, Silverio W, Dantas H, Pasquini N, D. Extraction and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from agro-industrial residue -soy hulls. Industrial Crops and Products. 2013. p. 480–8.
7.
Hanaor D, Michelazzi M, Leonelli C, Sorrell C. The effects of carboxylic acids on the aqueous dispersion and electrophoretic deposition of zro2. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2012. p. 235–44.
8.
Henrique M, Silvério H, Neto W, Pasquini D. Valorization of an agro-industrial waste, mango seed, by the extraction and characterization of its cellulose nanocrystals. Journal of Environmental Management. 2013. p. 202–9.
9.
Hu X, Wang J, Huang H. Impacts of some macromolecules on the characteristics of hydrogels prepared from pineapple peel cellulose using ionic liquid. Cellulose. 2013. p. 2923–33.
10.
Johar N, Ahmad I, Dufresne A. Extraction, preparation and characterization of cellulose fibres and nanocrystals from rice husk. Industrial Crops and Products. 2012. p. 93–9.
11.
Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A. Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2005. p. 3358–93.
12.
Lin N, Dufresne A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: current status and future prospect. European Polymer Journal. 2014. p. 302–25.
13.
Lu H, Gui Y, Zheng L, Liu X. Morphological, crystalline, thermal and physicochemical properties of cellulose nanocrystals obtained from sweet potato residue. Food Research International. 2013. p. 121–8.
14.
Lu P, Hsieh YL. Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from rice straw. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2012. p. 564–73.
15.
Prozil S, Evtuguin D, Silva A, Lopes L. Structural characterization of lignin from grape stalks (vitis vinifera l. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2014. p. 5420–8.
16.
Qiu X, Hu S. Smart" Materials Based on Cellulose: A Review of the Preparations, Properties, and Applications. Materials. 2013. p. 738–81.
17.
Raji Y, Jibril M, Misau I, Danjuma B. Production of vinegar from pineapple peel. International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Technology. 2012. p. 656–66.
18.
Sheltami R, Abdullah I, Ahmad I, Dufresne A, Kargarzadeh H. Extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from mengkuang leaves (pandanus tectorius). Carbohydrate Polymers. 2012. p. 772–9.
19.
Sun X, Xu F, Sun R, Fowler P, Baird M. Characteristics of degraded cellulose obtained from steamexploded wheat straw. Carbohydrate Research. 2005. p. 97–106.
20.
Thirawan B, Karnnasuta S, Srinorakutara T. Agricultural wastes potential (pineapple crown, durian peel and sugarcane leaves) on reducing sugar production by using sulfuric acid pretreatment following enzymatic hydrolysis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology. 2017. p. 361–70.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by