Issue image

More articles from Volume 13, Issue 1, 2024

Rheological Assessment of Liquids Offered in Paediatric Videofluoroscopy Swallowing Study

Meat substitutes in Media Discourse

Effect of Salt (Nacl) and Vacuum Packaging on Some of the Quality Attributes of Snakehead Fish

Lipid Profile and Blood Glucose Levels of Wistar Rats Fed a Non-High Fat Nutriment Supplemented with Black Garlic Extract

Quality Attributes of Ultrasound-Treated Prebiotic Fibre-Enriched Strawberry Juice

Citations

Crossref Logo

3

Crossref Logo

Budi Widianarko, Inneke Hantoro, Novita Ika Putri, Probo Yulianto Nugrahedi

(2025)

Transforming food systems in Semarang City, Indonesia: A short food supply chain model

Open Agriculture, 10(1)

10.1515/opag-2025-0440

Crossref Logo

Adrià Menéndez i Molist, Zein Kallas, Omar Vicente Guadarrama Fuentes

(2025)

How the proximity sales certification shapes consumer perception of sustainability in short food supply chains

Discover Sustainability, 6(1)

10.1007/s43621-025-01107-x

Crossref Logo

Monika Roman

(2026)

GENERATION Z PURCHASING BEHAVIORS WITHIN URBAN SHORT FOOD SUPPLY CHAINS

Annals of the Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists, XXVIII(1)

10.5604/01.3001.0055.6241

Quality Perception of Short Food Supply Chains Products: From the Producer’s to the Consumer’s Point of View

Marina Acella ,
Marina Acella

University of Torino

Alice Petrini ,
Alice Petrini
Contact Alice Petrini

University of Torino

Roberta Bulgari ,
Roberta Bulgari

University of Torino

Andrea Ertani ,
Andrea Ertani

University of Torino

András Sebök ,
András Sebök

Campden BRI Magyarország Nonprofit Kft

Marco Devecchi ,
Marco Devecchi

University of Torino

Silvana Nicola
Silvana Nicola

University of Torino

Published: 01.05.2024.

Volume 13, Issue 1 (2024)

pp. 127-144;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/13.1.2024.a10

Abstract

Short food supply chains (SFSCs) are a still developing phenomenon in the world of food production and distribution. They involve a direct connection between local farmers and consumers, with minimal intermediaries involved. SFSCs have gained significant interest in recent years due to their potential to promote sustainable agriculture and support local communities. As a result, many governments, organisations, and individuals have been exploring ways to develop and promote these chains as a viable alternative to conventional food supply chains. However, it is still unclear how SFSCs products are perceived differently by producers and consumers: what makes SFSCs products more desirable? Starting from a European project (SmartChain), answers from twenty questionnaires from SFSCs actors across Europe were analysed to understand the strengths and weaknesses of SFSCs products according to the producers. From their answers, 18 quality criteria referred to SFSCs products were obtained and then proposed to consumers through a second questionnaire. The second questionnaire aimed to better understand whether the producers’ points of view matched the consumers’ points of view. From the analysis of the results, it was possible to understand what criteria were considered quality attributes by producers and consumers. Organic production and the presence of both trained and vulnerable personnel were not particularly relevant to the quality perception of SFSCs products. The storage method, the assortment range, and the processing of the products were not evaluated as quality criteria. The consumers who were interviewed perceived the quality of a food product coming from an SFSC linked to the characteristics of the social context of the product. They associated products sold in SFSCs with non-processed food. Overall, such a survey can be considered a useful tool to deepen our knowledge about short food supply chains and offers several ideas for further studies and analysis.

Keywords

References

1.
Ophuis P, Van Trijp H, Del Giudice T, Caracciolo T, F. Quality dimensions and consumer preferences: A choice experiment in the Italian extra-virgin olive oil market. Agricultural Economics Review. 1995;(3):100–12.
2.
Sebok A, Varsányi K, Kujáni K, Xhakolari V, Fricz Á, Castellini A, et al. Value propositions for improving the competitiveness of short food supply chains built on technological and nontechnological innovations. International Journal of Food Studies. 2022;(2):4.
3.
Scozzafava G, Gerini F, Dominici A, Contini C, Casini L. Reach for the stars: The impact on consumer preferences of introducing a new top-tier typology into a PDO wine. Wine Economics and Policy. 2018;(2):140–52.
4.
Santana-Méridas O, González-Coloma A, Sánchez-Vioque R. Agricultural residues as a source of bioactive natural products. Phytochemistry Reviews. 2012;(4):447–66.
5.
Resano H, Sanjuán A, Albisu L. Consumers’ response to the EU Quality policy allowing for heterogeneous preferences. Food Policy. 2012;(4):355–65.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by